Below are words from Michael Moore who many don't take seriously, but it's much more than his bias to cheer on Obama. These are real words.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Friends,
Who among us is not at a loss for words? Tears pour out. Tears of joy. Tears of relief. A stunning, whopping landslide of hope in a time of deep despair.
In a nation that was founded on genocide and then built on the backs of slaves, it was an unexpected moment, shocking in its simplicity: Barack Obama, a good man, a black man, said he would bring change to Washington, and the majority of the country liked that idea. The racists were present throughout the campaign and in the voting booth. But they are no longer the majority, and we will see their flame of hate fizzle out in our lifetime.
There was another important "first" last night. Never before in our history has an avowed anti-war candidate been elected president during a time of war. I hope President-elect Obama remembers that as he considers expanding the war in Afghanistan. The faith we now have will be lost if he forgets the main issue on which he beat his fellow Dems in the primaries and then a great war hero in the general election: The people of America are tired of war. Sick and tired. And their voice was loud and clear yesterday.
It's been an inexcusable 44 years since a Democrat running for president has received even just 51% of the vote. That's because most Americans haven't really liked the Democrats. They see them as rarely having the guts to get the job done or stand up for the working people they say they support. Well, here's their chance. It has been handed to them, via the voting public, in the form of a man who is not a party hack, not a set-for-life Beltway bureaucrat. Will he now become one of them, or will he force them to be more like him? We pray for the latter.
But today we celebrate this triumph of decency over personal attack, of peace over war, of intelligence over a belief that Adam and Eve rode around on dinosaurs just 6,000 years ago. What will it be like to have a smart president? Science, banished for eight years, will return. Imagine supporting our country's greatest minds as they seek to cure illness, discover new forms of energy, and work to save the planet. I know, pinch me.
We may, just possibly, also see a time of refreshing openness, enlightenment and creativity. The arts and the artists will not be seen as the enemy. Perhaps art will be explored in order to discover the greater truths. When FDR was ushered in with his landslide in 1932, what followed was Frank Capra and Preston Sturgis, Woody Guthrie and John Steinbeck, Dorothea Lange and Orson Welles. All week long I have been inundated with media asking me, "gee, Mike, what will you do now that Bush is gone?" Are they kidding? What will it be like to work and create in an environment that nurtures and supports film and the arts, science and invention, and the freedom to be whatever you want to be? Watch a thousand flowers bloom! We've entered a new era, and if I could sum up our collective first thought of this new era, it is this: Anything Is Possible.
An African American has been elected President of the United States! Anything is possible! We can wrestle our economy out of the hands of the reckless rich and return it to the people. Anything is possible! Every citizen can be guaranteed health care. Anything is possible! We can stop melting the polar ice caps. Anything is possible! Those who have committed war crimes will be brought to justice. Anything is possible.
We really don't have much time. There is big work to do. But this is the week for all of us to revel in this great moment. Be humble about it. Do not treat the Republicans in your life the way they have treated you the past eight years. Show them the grace and goodness that Barack Obama exuded throughout the campaign. Though called every name in the book, he refused to lower himself to the gutter and sling the mud back. Can we follow his example? I know, it will be hard.
I want to thank everyone who gave of their time and resources to make this victory happen. It's been a long road, and huge damage has been done to this great country, not to mention to many of you who have lost your jobs, gone bankrupt from medical bills, or suffered through a loved one being shipped off to Iraq. We will now work to repair this damage, and it won't be easy.
But what a way to start! Barack Hussein Obama, the 44th President of the United States. Wow. Seriously, wow.
Yours,
Michael Moore
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Friday, October 31, 2008
Separating the Veil & Face: Is Abortion a Political Issue? (E-Mail Series)
I was going to post the dialogue I had with someone on this topic, but at the request of this person, I am not going to publish them. I will, however, give my own stances on where you draw the line between religion and politics, and what abortion falls under. Hope you enjoy this. It took a lot of work.
Simon Werth
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email 1
On the issue of abortion, I am “personally” pro-life, religiously speaking. I agree with the Church’s position, and hold certain the duty of every Catholic to educate mothers or couples who are considering an abortion don’t resort to avenues that end the life of an unborn, but disagree on how it should be handled. However, my vote doesn’t reflect the abortion issue at this time due to the failed attempts to assemble Pro-life and Pro-Choice members together to discuss & compromise on something – they don’t have to necessarily agree, but they should agree on lessening the number of abortions performed & should take an action to do something about it (at the community level). If you’ve been paying attention to the elections, both McCain and Obama observe Pro-Choice values. McCain may say he’s pro-life, but he emphasizes that he seeks no Constitutional ban on abortion and champions a Federalist form of government (Basically means he’ll let the states decide on Roe V. Wade). Where’s the lesser of two evils in that statement? Nowhere! It immediately ends his political grab on the abortion issue. Even if he were to bring in “conservative” judges, the Supreme Court will be the final judge of McCain’s appointee. And yes, during the Bush Administration, we’ve rejected some of Bush’s pick for conservative judges, because there needs to be the same amount of conservative and liberal judges (some even moderate) on the Supreme Court Benches. Point blank, he’s definitely lying trying to manipulate Catholics & ethic reform voters, almost using it as desperation to advance his political agenda (in the last coming weeks as we’ve seen). But yeah, it’s just propaganda & it was evidenced during the presidency of Bush. He failed to challenge the Roe v. Wade case on many occasions, because he was busy fighting “terrorism”. Anyways, we all know that the number of Pro-Choice supporters outnumber Pro-Life supporters. There’s the real problem – regarding McCain’s stance on letting states decide on Roe v Wade. Not enough people are educated on the issue of abortion: its causes & effects, consequences, etc. There are also differences in belief at when life begins. For us, that’s an easy question to answer because we have the leap of faith. However, for those without faith, strongly believe that life begins when the baby is separated from its mother (at birth) or when the fetus has developed all its organs (also known as organogenesis). Otherwise, to them, they believe that the fetus is a parasite.
Anyway, I believe that action speaks louder than words. I believe Obama’s healthcare plan is a pretty good solution to maybe lessen the number of abortions. Those on welfare & have an unplanned pregnancy think that abortion is an investment due to inability to pay for a child’s bare necessities. The health of a child is definitely one of the biggest concerns for why a mother or couple considers an abortion. They just don’t think they can get by. Is this fair? No. However, with the healthcare plan I believe it will fulfill the words John Paul II spoke (somewhere), “Recognize the art of the possibility and limit the harm done by such a law” (interpret this as a political reference). And really, what is McCain’s plan – if he somehow overturns Roe v Wade – to provide for mothers & couples with an unplanned pregnancy? As of now, he has no plans except adoption. Some mothers cannot live separated from their baby: It either lives or dies according to their logic. This is how you know it’s all propaganda & manipulation! A lying politician, how rare? – My biggest argument.
By the way, if we say we’re the “good” Catholics we say we are, we don’t need to push abortion as a political issue. I wouldn’t characterize it as lazy, rather a weak way to approach the moral issue at hand (although Pro-Choice supporters downplay the morality issue of an abortion – believe it or not, some Pro-Choice supporters are Catholic too on grounds that it protects the freewill or freedom that God has given us to sin. I think that’s a dumb stance because they ignore the mission statement of all Pro-Choice supporters, which is personally supporting a mother if she wanted an abortion). However, counteracting this weakness, we should go school to school, neighbor to neighbor, person to person and educate everyone on the dangers of abortion. I would even encourage schools to teach teens of the dangerous procedure performed in an abortion & how it should be the last resort (usually when it concerns the health of the mother, which is the Catholic exception supposedly). I totally support programs such as A Better Life. We need more counselors and volunteers to work on lessening the crime against humanity (religiously speaking). As of now, abortion has no place in politics, even though we have the eyes on the prize with Roe v Wade to include a clause in an unwritten chapter of our Constitution. If we say we are Catholics, let’s raise an even bigger awareness without the use of politics. Then, maybe, people will start to take our stance seriously.
Another reason why I support Obama is because he supports the principle for helping the poor. Based on McCain’s claim that Obama will higher your taxes, this is totally false. How? I’ve really dug deep & McCain’s claim is only true when you bring in an income (not revenue) of $200,000/individual or $250,000/(filed as a couple). “Joe the Plumber” was a weak argument circulated by McCain himself. I even think he’s a character McCain paid off. Joe didn’t understand the difference between revenue and income, and even worse…when you buy anything that is state-associated, you have to pay taxes (just as you pay taxes on groceries). So, it was a big misunderstanding. Also, this fear of “socialism” has got to stop! Not all socialism is bad. It might have been the Papal Encyclical Rerum Novarum (by Pope Pius? Can’t remember) that said 100% capitalism is a corrupt society, rather socialism & capitalism (co-existing) help all classes in a society. We need to think about the poor in this election – most definitely! Everyone seems to forget it, but we can’t, even though we both come from privileged families.
In addition, we employ government to take care of us. We’re not electing a Pope, Bishop, or Cardinal for our Church; we’re electing a commander in chief and leader that will inspire and work to guarantee our “flawless” Constitutional Amendments and Bill of Rights. That is why politicians are neutral on the issue of religion. It’s very hard to be politically correct when mentioning ideas that go against the Constitution & are aligned with the Bible. I know secularism is the “culture of death” (as described by John Paul II), but we don’t live in a perfect world. A theocracy is the last thing we need (unfortunately few countries like Iran still implement it). Refer to the Inquisition.
If there was any tension between us, I was certainly not aware. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion. You hold the ultimate truth when you’ve thoroughly thought about something or you’ve dedicated an enormous amount of time doing something for a certain cause or issue. Only you know what’s best for you (and God, of course). Politics is something I take seriously. And when people use religion to legitimize or denounce a political issue, it makes me angry.
I don’t want to sound selfish or anything, but we also need to be thinking about our own well-being. The war in Iraq is unjust – thousands are dying each month – and an economy is draining by the minute. The moment we forget ourselves and focus on something that has nothing to do with the troubles of today is a moment we will regret. So, don’t be swayed by words; the record speaks for itself. I’d take a community organizer (helping those who are in need) over a P.O.W. soldier aka “war hero” (in quotes because there’s some controversy in the things he’s done in Vietnam, which I could explain in detail if needed). I’ve followed this one since the beginning (Initially, I was a supporter of Kucinich and Ron Paul). I know both presidential candidates don’t fully represent the type of leadership we need in Washington DC; however, a few issues that concern Catholics (if I was voting based on religion) are tackled better by Obama (of course I don’t agree 100% with him), even though many are complaining about his liberal record, which isn’t based on just moral and ethical issues. He has a fair share of conservative points of view on some of those issues. Also, another one that isn’t garnering attention is the Embryonic Stem Cell research funding that both candidates support, although McCain (I hear) has a larger proposal for this particular type of research. To me, it’s obvious why he’d want that.
In summary, my vote will be based on 3 simple things (could be a myriad of other reasons, of course)
1) Against unjust war (preferably someone without compulsive tendencies; someone possessing stable temperament and judgment. I can explain to you in length why Iraq is an unjust war if needed. Yes, we need a military to protect ourselves, but we’re not supposed to be selfish & ignore the whole world to pursue an opportunity to boot a tyrannous leader. I can go into more detail if needed.)
2) The economy (reaching out to the poor, health care plan, keeping jobs in America, etc.)
3) A public education plan (Can potentially reduce the amount of unplanned pregnancies, make the young generation in this country competitive with the world, etc. This is really an endless section on how education can influence someone in making good decisions in his or her life. Again, I can go into more detail on this topic).
I hope everything will tie into my religious beliefs, but in ways you never thought could have an influence in addressing those issues – as long as it follows guidelines outlined in the Constitution. We need a working government that is unbiased in the way it approaches certain issues. Let’s keep this strictly politics!
And yes, we are blessed to live in America. God has generously blessed this country and the people who inhabit it. I hope & pray my vote and your vote will bring the change we need to make our country better. The whole may not be on our side as a result of our current president, but God will always be with us until the end of time & thereafter. It is promised to us that eternity awaits us and that time & turmoil will not be of essence. If we live according God’s words & see evil around us, we can reach out our hand and help. However, if we’ve attempted it and failed, but practice what we preach, God awaits us at the Gates of Heaven. This doesn’t have to be applied or connected to politics. Just make it a goal in your personal life. Also, never forget that we are here temporarily. Please God with the example you give to others and that is enough to save your soul!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email 2
I applaud your sound reasons for choosing stand up and fight for the rights of the unborn. However, U.S. politics is mandated by the Constitution; religion is mandated by the Bible (& our Pope – in this case). I am not going to vote for myself in this election or on my conscience, I am voting for America; and choosing the candidate that will enforce the principles outlined in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. In my opinion, it’s the American thing to do, although I’m not implying any questioning on behalf of your American or Un-American beliefs. No such thing exists – it’s a personal or rhetorical question we ask ourselves that differs person to person.
I would just like to emphasize that we have violated the UN Charters (even the Pope’s advice) by going into Iraq, which to me is just as unjust as the killing of an unborn, but maybe on a higher level of injustice due to the killing of rational, breathing, living human beings – many who are innocent Iraqi civilians as well. We’ve brought to the Iraqi nation, tears & unhappiness, contributed to the division between religious groups, and disrupted a functioning government. Saddam enforced the “if you don’t like it here, get out!” policy, which many don’t know. So, don’t try convincing me with people changing their minds about the Iraq War being just. Why can’t the Church be more open & comfortable in telling voters to consider “war issue” in their vote – specifically Father Pavano? Are we afraid that a liberal & Pro-Choice (terminology I find politically incorrect) will come into office? Are we afraid to say Obama is right? I’ve heard all the arguments, etc. and know more about Iraq than the average politician or American. I’m not trying to stretch or exaggerate my political muscle on this issue; I’m just being as truthful as I can be.
This doesn’t mean I’m ignoring the issue of abortion; I’m just ignoring it on grounds that it is a moral issue that should be decided within religion & let us take justice in our own hands. President Bush did pass the partial birth abortion ban, but has been unsuccessful in convincing the American people that Roe v Wade should be overturned. If he couldn’t do it, John McCain will definitely not do it; thus, if you’re a Catholic, voting for either candidate is fine (in my eyes). By the way, Obama did make a key vote on voting against government-assisted abortion, which means he draws the line between the government and you in freedom or freewill to go get an abortion (additional info: Obama encourages adoption too! bias in your argument?). And yes, I do believe “constitutionally” there is a difference or distinction between an abortion and murder. There's a misunderstanding where life begins in abortion; there's an understanding of life in a murder. That is why the Constitution will not work in defending the "rights" of the unborn, and when Roe v Wade is overturned it will probably be deemed unconstitutional (that's just the reality of it). You do know abortion has been a practice for many thousands of years, right? Why did the founders of this country leave it out? Was it an honest mistake or on purpose? I'm not trying to legitimize the practice in anyway though. Remember, as a rule of thumb, the Constitution is used when discussing politics; the Bible (or Pope, religious leader, etc) is used when discussing religion. Anyway, my personal belief is if you think an abortion will best benefit you, go out there, do your sin, deal with the consequences – God is watching all of us & recognizes that he created us with freewill. The Catholic mission has always been: Get to the mother before she has an abortion, otherwise we’re late. Catholics need to play catch-up, because we’re still on the defense in that regard. Let's not insert the political steroid, because using politicians to advance this belief is misguiding and cheating our duty to a certain extent.
Regardless of what you think, socialized healthcare is an important movement that seeks to improve government’s inability to help the lower & middle classes. I feel I can write a book here on why it’s important. You may argue that overconsumption may be an issue, etc., but our government’s job has always been to take care of the people and their freedoms – health should be included in that charter seeing that we have laws against murder. We need to guarantee every American the right to live after a gunshot wound, stabbing, etc. Am I right? It is a constitutionally acceptable issue. I don’t find it ironic that abortion has much to do with my stance on healthcare. There are always going to be rules and regulation when something like a healthcare plan is being pushed as a solution to help the millions who can’t & want to see a doctor to treat conditions that are life-threatening or painful etc. No one should be denied the right to see a doctor at any time, especially during emergency situations! I’ve seen & experienced first-hand in all the years I shadowed health professionals and volunteered in medical clinics.
I know Obama’s healthcare plan may not be the best, but McCain’s proposition is downright ugly & deceiving. Oh my, I seriously could write a lot here, but my aim isn’t to legitimize the movement of socialized healthcare in America. And if Obama’s healthcare package goes through (additional info: Ted Kennedy is working on it as we speak), I hope we work for making socialized healthcare a perfect transition in this century or decade, seeing that the European system for socialized healthcare is somewhat disorganized because of an unplanned agenda to deal with situations that constrain & limit the service of a properly functioning healthcare system.
Sorry if this disturbs or angers or frustrates or (anything) you. At the end of the day, we both have a difference in belief, conflict in interest, and rational disagreement that should not interfere with the way we interact or speak to one another. In other words, I hope this is something that you take no offense to, as opinion has the potential to divide people. If you choose, we can end this debate or argument, because I know both of us strongly cling to our beliefs. I hate to think both of us are misguided, because we probably are by technicality, although what I believe best describes my personality. I’m probably not the most Catholic person and probably need more spiritual guidance (all of us need it), especially since my political stance doesn’t entirely reflect my religious values. I treat both as a separate deal. The Pro-Life and Pro-Choice labels don’t pose a concern to me; just elect the person best fit for the job – beliefs & issues differ person to person in priority. And yeah, you’re probably going to ridicule me in your circle, tell people I live in a cloud of predicament & maze of no hope, chant that I’m a baby killer, label me a liberal, or antagonize me as an atheist, which are all mostly false to an extreme extent (especially the atheist part). However, sometimes you can’t connect the dots in certain aspects of life, such as the "link" between Evolution and Human Life, which is a possibility (although uncertain to a degree. This issue has its own realm of discussion though). With me, I just find it unnecessary to use my religion to influence my political beliefs and advance bias for any candidate running for office. When I find a harmony or medium between religion and politics, I will not be afraid to proclaim it. I know I have a lot of maturing, growing up, learning to do, but as of now this is what I really look like. I’ll be honest; I don’t know the statistics, feeling, or stances on the abortion topic. My family, both sides – Mom & Dad, have never dealt with the infidelities, abortion, divorce, and other disheartening situations. So, my inexperience is probably a contribution in my own failure to understand certain positions that you or other people may hold on topic of abortion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email 3
I, for one, believe that President Bush passed the partial birth abortion ban just to “shut up” pro-lifers in order to redeem himself before campaign time (~2003). He knew Catholics were his biggest supporters. It isn’t really a conspiracy, but it’s a realistic notion that the Catholics decided the last 2 elections. However, to a certain extent, I do believe Roe v Wade was justly decided, tagged as a pending case until there is concrete and clear evidence on when life truly begins. Politically speaking, using the Constitution as an article of reference, can I say Roe v Wade that it was justly decided as a Supreme Court case. In my day, I would hope to see that we’ve solved this dilemma and call for an end to abortion for good. Don’t mistake my position for hypocrisy, because I personally believe all life is created life from a sacred & powerful being - religiously speaking. Others may not put God into the picture, but that’s just them. They paint a “distorted” depiction of why abortion can be morally accepted, although I think their claims are downright preposterous and they probably think the same about people who believe in God. So, which article of reference becomes dictates the only direction we can take using government as an intervening power? Our Constitution!
Anyways, why would you trust “lying” McCain (assuming he’s using Bush’s strategy of gaining the Catholic vote)? You know he’s using the pro-life label to get the Catholic vote. We are, undeniably, the most powerful religion on Earth; powerful enough to write the rules in the “good book” of the Constitution back in the 18th century. We can get our hands on almost any issue – bad or good (from past history). Why haven’t we written off Roe v Wade yet? It’s “constitutionally” risky! I don’t think you’d be comfortable discussing this issue, because I’m assuming *crosses fingers* that you haven’t heard them before.
I’m not sure where you pulled those senate votes & interviews of Obama saying those exact words. I’ve never seen or heard those before. Same with the Planned Family organization you’ve referred to. That’s unfamiliar ground to me. If Bush was truly pro-life, he would’ve broken up that organization due to increased abortion rates & failure to correspond to their core mission statement.
Looking back, I know there are many flaws in my arguments, because it’s very hard to articulate my true feelings on abortion. However, if you really want to know how much I think of it, it’s not a central issue in politics. Sorry. Call me an outcast Catholic, but I’m sticking to the Constitutional vote. If God were to vote in this election, he would vote neither, right? (both support Pro-Choice values) I remember when you stated, “I’m voting with the Church.” The Vatican has said nothing on this current election. So, trying to tell me there’s a right answer in choosing a president isn’t going to work in the criteria you’ve established for casting your vote for McCain.
Also, Catholics & ethic reformers had 3 damn years to work for nominating a true Pro-Life candidate? Why are they starting now? Propaganda! In my opinion, you don’t vote for your conscience in this election, because which one of them has acted on fighting for the rights of an unborn? Neither. They’re two senators who spend 4-8 hours voting to make our lives “easier”. None have any credentials to fight abortion; none will bring change to the issue. It’s all lies; it’s just words. The one who can stare you in the face and tell you “it cannot be done” is telling the truth. It’s hard for politicians to admit they’re wrong or say there’s no solution to a problem, but when someone tells you it’s an impossible issue to tackle, I believe them off of the pure logic I’ve written to you in this entire discussion.
Look here, I used to feel the same way as you with regards to abortion until I realized that we’re wasting our time (as Pro-Life supporters) with convincing the government to overturn Roe v Wade. Unfortunately, the Constitution is the only article of reference the government is allowed to use. I’m sure there’s a way go around the issue, in especially going door to door to preach on the dangerous of abortion. Maybe you’re a brilliant-minded reformer who will actually make strides in getting millions of people to believe that abortion is an atrocious act? I really don’t know. However, currently, the movement (in politics) is somewhat of a waste of time. Yeah, we’re allowed to fight to change the laws, but we also need to understand where everyone else stands so we don’t look like lunatics who want to brainwash them with our ideas to overturn Roe v Wade. Let’s get people to understand the situation before it escalates to the level of ignorance. As pro-life people united, we can do all of these things, right? By the way, I’m sorry I don’t know too much about the abortion issue. I’m not qualified to speak on it, although I can maybe emphasize why it’s not an important political issue. Like I’ve said before, let’s not insert the political steroid in advancing the direction of this country. Corruption can result from such things – I’m not just talking about the Catholic faith; this applies to other religious groups trying to change documents highlighting the pride of this country. Like many say, “If you don’t like it here, get out before you stir up more trouble.”
Something Else to Consider (Pretending that Roe v Wade was overturned): I still don't understand the stance of the Catholic Church regarding when abortion is acceptable. They say that if it intrudes with the health of the mother, it is acceptable to abort. So, if Roe v Wade is overturned and a ban on abortion is issued, will those same clauses exist? If so, why should we totally ban abortion if that's a loophole one can use to their advantage? I don't get it. We’re still going to need it in order to save those mothers facing death as a result of birth. As a Church, we either stand against it or stand for it if it's going to be used in politics for us to choose sides in a presidential election. Since the abortion issue can't be used rightfully in the political realm, the Catholic Church should remain neutral or silent when evaluating presidential candidates due to the exceptions for when an abortion can morally acceptable. That is why I hold the position and belief that we should keep the mission statement for spreading the word about abortion within our Church and take justice into our own hands to ensure that less abortion are being performed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email 4
Pro-Choice is "personally" encouraging or supporting the mother if she wanted an abortion. That is why I'm not Pro-Choice. And if there was something in between, I'm probably placed in that category, leaning toward the Pro-Life side (because I hope someone gives evidence that the unborn is life - I really, really do!). I tend to not look at labels that usually mislead people i.e. liberal & conservative, pro-choice & pro-life, etc. By the way, what's scary about the Constitution? Politically, that is the most acceptable way to vote. That's my duty as an American citizen. Like I wrote to you in my last e-mail, I treat politics as a separate deal. In fact, go through the last e-mail I sent: I did support my thoughts on why abortion shouldn't be a political issue. I was making a reference to the video you sent me on "vote for your conscience" or whatever. I'm not saying you're specifically brainwashed, because you know what you're fighting for; however, you might be misguided on some political principles (not in my thoughts, but in the thoughts of others). Bottomline: It makes Pro-lifers look weak by putting on the political muscle. And yes, I do believe, like many Constitutionalists, that Roe v Wade was justly decided. However, that doesn't mean I don't want to see it overturned someday!
And yes, I agree let's not discuss this issue any further, because it may even escalate to a level of anger (I don’t want this to happen). We've pretty much walked separate paths with this topic. It's like a monkey and rabbit trying to communicate. Neither understands one another. However, I'm probably more comfortable handling other issues that concern this election. I usually don't discuss the abortion topic with people. I was going to go into more analogies and detail, but I've decided to end it right here, because you're probably buggin' out by now.
By the way, when Roe v Wade is overturned, whatever you have written on abortion will be POLITICALLY correct. I will absolutely take that stand in religion and politics. That will be the day I connect the dots between my religion and politics. We will have gone through an aggressive ethics reform by that time - in my prediction. It's just that the Constitution is based on absolute truth. While abortion may be murder for you, someone else may not have that exact thinking (not me, of course). I want government to have flexibility (accommodating for all sides as a mediation of fairness) in some issues, especially when there's 2 sides and no evidence.
Added Analogy: Your claim is that Abortion is a non-negotiable issue. In short, I argue that it is a negotiable issue. Pro-Choice and Pro-Life supporters should and need to assemble to better understand each side’s position and can agree most likely agree on trying to lessen the number of abortions performed. We can’t be narrow-minded on anything. We should always initiate or anticipate a debate or commission to better understand eachother. My philosophy has always been to unite and not divide.
A bad section of a town, known as the “projects”, is a place where drug traffickers, thieves, murderers reside. Coincidentally, most of them are classified as the lowest class on the economic scale. However, a city committee has decided to designate that certain area as one that needs work for improvement of living conditions. Usually, gentrification is a plan to transform a section of town into a more livable part of town (improvement to middle or higher class of living. Think Manhatten!) The city talks to serious bidders to buy up that certain part of town where most crimes are committed. However, the people who live there are unwilling to leave their homes, because they will have no where else to go. It becomes a non-negotiable issue. Every voice needs an answer; and every answer needs a solution (the best one possible). In certain cases, with a gentrification movement, the people in town riot and protest the streets in order to get back their homes. You see, if we leave a discussion or forum on the table we surrender our fight against abortion. We win when we work in a bi-partisan manner. Trust me, abortion will become uncommon if we all band together and work on lessening amount of abortion in promoting adoption, government aide for low-income families with a newborn (which actually exists), etc. We don’t need politics to work in our favor; we can get the job done our way. Government cannot solve all our problems. Sometimes we have to take justice in our own hands, right? Also, just because something is legal doesn’t make it common or popular, although if it is popular we can always raise awareness (not just by telling people abortion is wrong & murder. We should show them mothers who went through an abortion: the decision, procedure, post-partum depression, etc. From those types of stories, people will draw the right conclusion. Trust me! I started to see this idea when Terry Shaivo was denied a feeding tube at the request of her husband and was left to die in vain.
Simon Werth
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email 1
On the issue of abortion, I am “personally” pro-life, religiously speaking. I agree with the Church’s position, and hold certain the duty of every Catholic to educate mothers or couples who are considering an abortion don’t resort to avenues that end the life of an unborn, but disagree on how it should be handled. However, my vote doesn’t reflect the abortion issue at this time due to the failed attempts to assemble Pro-life and Pro-Choice members together to discuss & compromise on something – they don’t have to necessarily agree, but they should agree on lessening the number of abortions performed & should take an action to do something about it (at the community level). If you’ve been paying attention to the elections, both McCain and Obama observe Pro-Choice values. McCain may say he’s pro-life, but he emphasizes that he seeks no Constitutional ban on abortion and champions a Federalist form of government (Basically means he’ll let the states decide on Roe V. Wade). Where’s the lesser of two evils in that statement? Nowhere! It immediately ends his political grab on the abortion issue. Even if he were to bring in “conservative” judges, the Supreme Court will be the final judge of McCain’s appointee. And yes, during the Bush Administration, we’ve rejected some of Bush’s pick for conservative judges, because there needs to be the same amount of conservative and liberal judges (some even moderate) on the Supreme Court Benches. Point blank, he’s definitely lying trying to manipulate Catholics & ethic reform voters, almost using it as desperation to advance his political agenda (in the last coming weeks as we’ve seen). But yeah, it’s just propaganda & it was evidenced during the presidency of Bush. He failed to challenge the Roe v. Wade case on many occasions, because he was busy fighting “terrorism”. Anyways, we all know that the number of Pro-Choice supporters outnumber Pro-Life supporters. There’s the real problem – regarding McCain’s stance on letting states decide on Roe v Wade. Not enough people are educated on the issue of abortion: its causes & effects, consequences, etc. There are also differences in belief at when life begins. For us, that’s an easy question to answer because we have the leap of faith. However, for those without faith, strongly believe that life begins when the baby is separated from its mother (at birth) or when the fetus has developed all its organs (also known as organogenesis). Otherwise, to them, they believe that the fetus is a parasite.
Anyway, I believe that action speaks louder than words. I believe Obama’s healthcare plan is a pretty good solution to maybe lessen the number of abortions. Those on welfare & have an unplanned pregnancy think that abortion is an investment due to inability to pay for a child’s bare necessities. The health of a child is definitely one of the biggest concerns for why a mother or couple considers an abortion. They just don’t think they can get by. Is this fair? No. However, with the healthcare plan I believe it will fulfill the words John Paul II spoke (somewhere), “Recognize the art of the possibility and limit the harm done by such a law” (interpret this as a political reference). And really, what is McCain’s plan – if he somehow overturns Roe v Wade – to provide for mothers & couples with an unplanned pregnancy? As of now, he has no plans except adoption. Some mothers cannot live separated from their baby: It either lives or dies according to their logic. This is how you know it’s all propaganda & manipulation! A lying politician, how rare? – My biggest argument.
By the way, if we say we’re the “good” Catholics we say we are, we don’t need to push abortion as a political issue. I wouldn’t characterize it as lazy, rather a weak way to approach the moral issue at hand (although Pro-Choice supporters downplay the morality issue of an abortion – believe it or not, some Pro-Choice supporters are Catholic too on grounds that it protects the freewill or freedom that God has given us to sin. I think that’s a dumb stance because they ignore the mission statement of all Pro-Choice supporters, which is personally supporting a mother if she wanted an abortion). However, counteracting this weakness, we should go school to school, neighbor to neighbor, person to person and educate everyone on the dangers of abortion. I would even encourage schools to teach teens of the dangerous procedure performed in an abortion & how it should be the last resort (usually when it concerns the health of the mother, which is the Catholic exception supposedly). I totally support programs such as A Better Life. We need more counselors and volunteers to work on lessening the crime against humanity (religiously speaking). As of now, abortion has no place in politics, even though we have the eyes on the prize with Roe v Wade to include a clause in an unwritten chapter of our Constitution. If we say we are Catholics, let’s raise an even bigger awareness without the use of politics. Then, maybe, people will start to take our stance seriously.
Another reason why I support Obama is because he supports the principle for helping the poor. Based on McCain’s claim that Obama will higher your taxes, this is totally false. How? I’ve really dug deep & McCain’s claim is only true when you bring in an income (not revenue) of $200,000/individual or $250,000/(filed as a couple). “Joe the Plumber” was a weak argument circulated by McCain himself. I even think he’s a character McCain paid off. Joe didn’t understand the difference between revenue and income, and even worse…when you buy anything that is state-associated, you have to pay taxes (just as you pay taxes on groceries). So, it was a big misunderstanding. Also, this fear of “socialism” has got to stop! Not all socialism is bad. It might have been the Papal Encyclical Rerum Novarum (by Pope Pius? Can’t remember) that said 100% capitalism is a corrupt society, rather socialism & capitalism (co-existing) help all classes in a society. We need to think about the poor in this election – most definitely! Everyone seems to forget it, but we can’t, even though we both come from privileged families.
In addition, we employ government to take care of us. We’re not electing a Pope, Bishop, or Cardinal for our Church; we’re electing a commander in chief and leader that will inspire and work to guarantee our “flawless” Constitutional Amendments and Bill of Rights. That is why politicians are neutral on the issue of religion. It’s very hard to be politically correct when mentioning ideas that go against the Constitution & are aligned with the Bible. I know secularism is the “culture of death” (as described by John Paul II), but we don’t live in a perfect world. A theocracy is the last thing we need (unfortunately few countries like Iran still implement it). Refer to the Inquisition.
If there was any tension between us, I was certainly not aware. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion. You hold the ultimate truth when you’ve thoroughly thought about something or you’ve dedicated an enormous amount of time doing something for a certain cause or issue. Only you know what’s best for you (and God, of course). Politics is something I take seriously. And when people use religion to legitimize or denounce a political issue, it makes me angry.
I don’t want to sound selfish or anything, but we also need to be thinking about our own well-being. The war in Iraq is unjust – thousands are dying each month – and an economy is draining by the minute. The moment we forget ourselves and focus on something that has nothing to do with the troubles of today is a moment we will regret. So, don’t be swayed by words; the record speaks for itself. I’d take a community organizer (helping those who are in need) over a P.O.W. soldier aka “war hero” (in quotes because there’s some controversy in the things he’s done in Vietnam, which I could explain in detail if needed). I’ve followed this one since the beginning (Initially, I was a supporter of Kucinich and Ron Paul). I know both presidential candidates don’t fully represent the type of leadership we need in Washington DC; however, a few issues that concern Catholics (if I was voting based on religion) are tackled better by Obama (of course I don’t agree 100% with him), even though many are complaining about his liberal record, which isn’t based on just moral and ethical issues. He has a fair share of conservative points of view on some of those issues. Also, another one that isn’t garnering attention is the Embryonic Stem Cell research funding that both candidates support, although McCain (I hear) has a larger proposal for this particular type of research. To me, it’s obvious why he’d want that.
In summary, my vote will be based on 3 simple things (could be a myriad of other reasons, of course)
1) Against unjust war (preferably someone without compulsive tendencies; someone possessing stable temperament and judgment. I can explain to you in length why Iraq is an unjust war if needed. Yes, we need a military to protect ourselves, but we’re not supposed to be selfish & ignore the whole world to pursue an opportunity to boot a tyrannous leader. I can go into more detail if needed.)
2) The economy (reaching out to the poor, health care plan, keeping jobs in America, etc.)
3) A public education plan (Can potentially reduce the amount of unplanned pregnancies, make the young generation in this country competitive with the world, etc. This is really an endless section on how education can influence someone in making good decisions in his or her life. Again, I can go into more detail on this topic).
I hope everything will tie into my religious beliefs, but in ways you never thought could have an influence in addressing those issues – as long as it follows guidelines outlined in the Constitution. We need a working government that is unbiased in the way it approaches certain issues. Let’s keep this strictly politics!
And yes, we are blessed to live in America. God has generously blessed this country and the people who inhabit it. I hope & pray my vote and your vote will bring the change we need to make our country better. The whole may not be on our side as a result of our current president, but God will always be with us until the end of time & thereafter. It is promised to us that eternity awaits us and that time & turmoil will not be of essence. If we live according God’s words & see evil around us, we can reach out our hand and help. However, if we’ve attempted it and failed, but practice what we preach, God awaits us at the Gates of Heaven. This doesn’t have to be applied or connected to politics. Just make it a goal in your personal life. Also, never forget that we are here temporarily. Please God with the example you give to others and that is enough to save your soul!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email 2
I applaud your sound reasons for choosing stand up and fight for the rights of the unborn. However, U.S. politics is mandated by the Constitution; religion is mandated by the Bible (& our Pope – in this case). I am not going to vote for myself in this election or on my conscience, I am voting for America; and choosing the candidate that will enforce the principles outlined in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. In my opinion, it’s the American thing to do, although I’m not implying any questioning on behalf of your American or Un-American beliefs. No such thing exists – it’s a personal or rhetorical question we ask ourselves that differs person to person.
I would just like to emphasize that we have violated the UN Charters (even the Pope’s advice) by going into Iraq, which to me is just as unjust as the killing of an unborn, but maybe on a higher level of injustice due to the killing of rational, breathing, living human beings – many who are innocent Iraqi civilians as well. We’ve brought to the Iraqi nation, tears & unhappiness, contributed to the division between religious groups, and disrupted a functioning government. Saddam enforced the “if you don’t like it here, get out!” policy, which many don’t know. So, don’t try convincing me with people changing their minds about the Iraq War being just. Why can’t the Church be more open & comfortable in telling voters to consider “war issue” in their vote – specifically Father Pavano? Are we afraid that a liberal & Pro-Choice (terminology I find politically incorrect) will come into office? Are we afraid to say Obama is right? I’ve heard all the arguments, etc. and know more about Iraq than the average politician or American. I’m not trying to stretch or exaggerate my political muscle on this issue; I’m just being as truthful as I can be.
This doesn’t mean I’m ignoring the issue of abortion; I’m just ignoring it on grounds that it is a moral issue that should be decided within religion & let us take justice in our own hands. President Bush did pass the partial birth abortion ban, but has been unsuccessful in convincing the American people that Roe v Wade should be overturned. If he couldn’t do it, John McCain will definitely not do it; thus, if you’re a Catholic, voting for either candidate is fine (in my eyes). By the way, Obama did make a key vote on voting against government-assisted abortion, which means he draws the line between the government and you in freedom or freewill to go get an abortion (additional info: Obama encourages adoption too! bias in your argument?). And yes, I do believe “constitutionally” there is a difference or distinction between an abortion and murder. There's a misunderstanding where life begins in abortion; there's an understanding of life in a murder. That is why the Constitution will not work in defending the "rights" of the unborn, and when Roe v Wade is overturned it will probably be deemed unconstitutional (that's just the reality of it). You do know abortion has been a practice for many thousands of years, right? Why did the founders of this country leave it out? Was it an honest mistake or on purpose? I'm not trying to legitimize the practice in anyway though. Remember, as a rule of thumb, the Constitution is used when discussing politics; the Bible (or Pope, religious leader, etc) is used when discussing religion. Anyway, my personal belief is if you think an abortion will best benefit you, go out there, do your sin, deal with the consequences – God is watching all of us & recognizes that he created us with freewill. The Catholic mission has always been: Get to the mother before she has an abortion, otherwise we’re late. Catholics need to play catch-up, because we’re still on the defense in that regard. Let's not insert the political steroid, because using politicians to advance this belief is misguiding and cheating our duty to a certain extent.
Regardless of what you think, socialized healthcare is an important movement that seeks to improve government’s inability to help the lower & middle classes. I feel I can write a book here on why it’s important. You may argue that overconsumption may be an issue, etc., but our government’s job has always been to take care of the people and their freedoms – health should be included in that charter seeing that we have laws against murder. We need to guarantee every American the right to live after a gunshot wound, stabbing, etc. Am I right? It is a constitutionally acceptable issue. I don’t find it ironic that abortion has much to do with my stance on healthcare. There are always going to be rules and regulation when something like a healthcare plan is being pushed as a solution to help the millions who can’t & want to see a doctor to treat conditions that are life-threatening or painful etc. No one should be denied the right to see a doctor at any time, especially during emergency situations! I’ve seen & experienced first-hand in all the years I shadowed health professionals and volunteered in medical clinics.
I know Obama’s healthcare plan may not be the best, but McCain’s proposition is downright ugly & deceiving. Oh my, I seriously could write a lot here, but my aim isn’t to legitimize the movement of socialized healthcare in America. And if Obama’s healthcare package goes through (additional info: Ted Kennedy is working on it as we speak), I hope we work for making socialized healthcare a perfect transition in this century or decade, seeing that the European system for socialized healthcare is somewhat disorganized because of an unplanned agenda to deal with situations that constrain & limit the service of a properly functioning healthcare system.
Sorry if this disturbs or angers or frustrates or (anything) you. At the end of the day, we both have a difference in belief, conflict in interest, and rational disagreement that should not interfere with the way we interact or speak to one another. In other words, I hope this is something that you take no offense to, as opinion has the potential to divide people. If you choose, we can end this debate or argument, because I know both of us strongly cling to our beliefs. I hate to think both of us are misguided, because we probably are by technicality, although what I believe best describes my personality. I’m probably not the most Catholic person and probably need more spiritual guidance (all of us need it), especially since my political stance doesn’t entirely reflect my religious values. I treat both as a separate deal. The Pro-Life and Pro-Choice labels don’t pose a concern to me; just elect the person best fit for the job – beliefs & issues differ person to person in priority. And yeah, you’re probably going to ridicule me in your circle, tell people I live in a cloud of predicament & maze of no hope, chant that I’m a baby killer, label me a liberal, or antagonize me as an atheist, which are all mostly false to an extreme extent (especially the atheist part). However, sometimes you can’t connect the dots in certain aspects of life, such as the "link" between Evolution and Human Life, which is a possibility (although uncertain to a degree. This issue has its own realm of discussion though). With me, I just find it unnecessary to use my religion to influence my political beliefs and advance bias for any candidate running for office. When I find a harmony or medium between religion and politics, I will not be afraid to proclaim it. I know I have a lot of maturing, growing up, learning to do, but as of now this is what I really look like. I’ll be honest; I don’t know the statistics, feeling, or stances on the abortion topic. My family, both sides – Mom & Dad, have never dealt with the infidelities, abortion, divorce, and other disheartening situations. So, my inexperience is probably a contribution in my own failure to understand certain positions that you or other people may hold on topic of abortion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email 3
I, for one, believe that President Bush passed the partial birth abortion ban just to “shut up” pro-lifers in order to redeem himself before campaign time (~2003). He knew Catholics were his biggest supporters. It isn’t really a conspiracy, but it’s a realistic notion that the Catholics decided the last 2 elections. However, to a certain extent, I do believe Roe v Wade was justly decided, tagged as a pending case until there is concrete and clear evidence on when life truly begins. Politically speaking, using the Constitution as an article of reference, can I say Roe v Wade that it was justly decided as a Supreme Court case. In my day, I would hope to see that we’ve solved this dilemma and call for an end to abortion for good. Don’t mistake my position for hypocrisy, because I personally believe all life is created life from a sacred & powerful being - religiously speaking. Others may not put God into the picture, but that’s just them. They paint a “distorted” depiction of why abortion can be morally accepted, although I think their claims are downright preposterous and they probably think the same about people who believe in God. So, which article of reference becomes dictates the only direction we can take using government as an intervening power? Our Constitution!
Anyways, why would you trust “lying” McCain (assuming he’s using Bush’s strategy of gaining the Catholic vote)? You know he’s using the pro-life label to get the Catholic vote. We are, undeniably, the most powerful religion on Earth; powerful enough to write the rules in the “good book” of the Constitution back in the 18th century. We can get our hands on almost any issue – bad or good (from past history). Why haven’t we written off Roe v Wade yet? It’s “constitutionally” risky! I don’t think you’d be comfortable discussing this issue, because I’m assuming *crosses fingers* that you haven’t heard them before.
I’m not sure where you pulled those senate votes & interviews of Obama saying those exact words. I’ve never seen or heard those before. Same with the Planned Family organization you’ve referred to. That’s unfamiliar ground to me. If Bush was truly pro-life, he would’ve broken up that organization due to increased abortion rates & failure to correspond to their core mission statement.
Looking back, I know there are many flaws in my arguments, because it’s very hard to articulate my true feelings on abortion. However, if you really want to know how much I think of it, it’s not a central issue in politics. Sorry. Call me an outcast Catholic, but I’m sticking to the Constitutional vote. If God were to vote in this election, he would vote neither, right? (both support Pro-Choice values) I remember when you stated, “I’m voting with the Church.” The Vatican has said nothing on this current election. So, trying to tell me there’s a right answer in choosing a president isn’t going to work in the criteria you’ve established for casting your vote for McCain.
Also, Catholics & ethic reformers had 3 damn years to work for nominating a true Pro-Life candidate? Why are they starting now? Propaganda! In my opinion, you don’t vote for your conscience in this election, because which one of them has acted on fighting for the rights of an unborn? Neither. They’re two senators who spend 4-8 hours voting to make our lives “easier”. None have any credentials to fight abortion; none will bring change to the issue. It’s all lies; it’s just words. The one who can stare you in the face and tell you “it cannot be done” is telling the truth. It’s hard for politicians to admit they’re wrong or say there’s no solution to a problem, but when someone tells you it’s an impossible issue to tackle, I believe them off of the pure logic I’ve written to you in this entire discussion.
Look here, I used to feel the same way as you with regards to abortion until I realized that we’re wasting our time (as Pro-Life supporters) with convincing the government to overturn Roe v Wade. Unfortunately, the Constitution is the only article of reference the government is allowed to use. I’m sure there’s a way go around the issue, in especially going door to door to preach on the dangerous of abortion. Maybe you’re a brilliant-minded reformer who will actually make strides in getting millions of people to believe that abortion is an atrocious act? I really don’t know. However, currently, the movement (in politics) is somewhat of a waste of time. Yeah, we’re allowed to fight to change the laws, but we also need to understand where everyone else stands so we don’t look like lunatics who want to brainwash them with our ideas to overturn Roe v Wade. Let’s get people to understand the situation before it escalates to the level of ignorance. As pro-life people united, we can do all of these things, right? By the way, I’m sorry I don’t know too much about the abortion issue. I’m not qualified to speak on it, although I can maybe emphasize why it’s not an important political issue. Like I’ve said before, let’s not insert the political steroid in advancing the direction of this country. Corruption can result from such things – I’m not just talking about the Catholic faith; this applies to other religious groups trying to change documents highlighting the pride of this country. Like many say, “If you don’t like it here, get out before you stir up more trouble.”
Something Else to Consider (Pretending that Roe v Wade was overturned): I still don't understand the stance of the Catholic Church regarding when abortion is acceptable. They say that if it intrudes with the health of the mother, it is acceptable to abort. So, if Roe v Wade is overturned and a ban on abortion is issued, will those same clauses exist? If so, why should we totally ban abortion if that's a loophole one can use to their advantage? I don't get it. We’re still going to need it in order to save those mothers facing death as a result of birth. As a Church, we either stand against it or stand for it if it's going to be used in politics for us to choose sides in a presidential election. Since the abortion issue can't be used rightfully in the political realm, the Catholic Church should remain neutral or silent when evaluating presidential candidates due to the exceptions for when an abortion can morally acceptable. That is why I hold the position and belief that we should keep the mission statement for spreading the word about abortion within our Church and take justice into our own hands to ensure that less abortion are being performed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email 4
Pro-Choice is "personally" encouraging or supporting the mother if she wanted an abortion. That is why I'm not Pro-Choice. And if there was something in between, I'm probably placed in that category, leaning toward the Pro-Life side (because I hope someone gives evidence that the unborn is life - I really, really do!). I tend to not look at labels that usually mislead people i.e. liberal & conservative, pro-choice & pro-life, etc. By the way, what's scary about the Constitution? Politically, that is the most acceptable way to vote. That's my duty as an American citizen. Like I wrote to you in my last e-mail, I treat politics as a separate deal. In fact, go through the last e-mail I sent: I did support my thoughts on why abortion shouldn't be a political issue. I was making a reference to the video you sent me on "vote for your conscience" or whatever. I'm not saying you're specifically brainwashed, because you know what you're fighting for; however, you might be misguided on some political principles (not in my thoughts, but in the thoughts of others). Bottomline: It makes Pro-lifers look weak by putting on the political muscle. And yes, I do believe, like many Constitutionalists, that Roe v Wade was justly decided. However, that doesn't mean I don't want to see it overturned someday!
And yes, I agree let's not discuss this issue any further, because it may even escalate to a level of anger (I don’t want this to happen). We've pretty much walked separate paths with this topic. It's like a monkey and rabbit trying to communicate. Neither understands one another. However, I'm probably more comfortable handling other issues that concern this election. I usually don't discuss the abortion topic with people. I was going to go into more analogies and detail, but I've decided to end it right here, because you're probably buggin' out by now.
By the way, when Roe v Wade is overturned, whatever you have written on abortion will be POLITICALLY correct. I will absolutely take that stand in religion and politics. That will be the day I connect the dots between my religion and politics. We will have gone through an aggressive ethics reform by that time - in my prediction. It's just that the Constitution is based on absolute truth. While abortion may be murder for you, someone else may not have that exact thinking (not me, of course). I want government to have flexibility (accommodating for all sides as a mediation of fairness) in some issues, especially when there's 2 sides and no evidence.
Added Analogy: Your claim is that Abortion is a non-negotiable issue. In short, I argue that it is a negotiable issue. Pro-Choice and Pro-Life supporters should and need to assemble to better understand each side’s position and can agree most likely agree on trying to lessen the number of abortions performed. We can’t be narrow-minded on anything. We should always initiate or anticipate a debate or commission to better understand eachother. My philosophy has always been to unite and not divide.
A bad section of a town, known as the “projects”, is a place where drug traffickers, thieves, murderers reside. Coincidentally, most of them are classified as the lowest class on the economic scale. However, a city committee has decided to designate that certain area as one that needs work for improvement of living conditions. Usually, gentrification is a plan to transform a section of town into a more livable part of town (improvement to middle or higher class of living. Think Manhatten!) The city talks to serious bidders to buy up that certain part of town where most crimes are committed. However, the people who live there are unwilling to leave their homes, because they will have no where else to go. It becomes a non-negotiable issue. Every voice needs an answer; and every answer needs a solution (the best one possible). In certain cases, with a gentrification movement, the people in town riot and protest the streets in order to get back their homes. You see, if we leave a discussion or forum on the table we surrender our fight against abortion. We win when we work in a bi-partisan manner. Trust me, abortion will become uncommon if we all band together and work on lessening amount of abortion in promoting adoption, government aide for low-income families with a newborn (which actually exists), etc. We don’t need politics to work in our favor; we can get the job done our way. Government cannot solve all our problems. Sometimes we have to take justice in our own hands, right? Also, just because something is legal doesn’t make it common or popular, although if it is popular we can always raise awareness (not just by telling people abortion is wrong & murder. We should show them mothers who went through an abortion: the decision, procedure, post-partum depression, etc. From those types of stories, people will draw the right conclusion. Trust me! I started to see this idea when Terry Shaivo was denied a feeding tube at the request of her husband and was left to die in vain.
Friday, October 10, 2008
To Registered Voters from Across the Land:
Read the article below & then proceed to read my own Reflection:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081011/ap_on_el_pr/mccain_angry_crowds
My fellow Americans,
The notions you may have held in the past must be renewed & counteracted to secure America's place in the present and future. Americans cannot stick to their old & stubborn ways by using stereotypes to emphasize a choice in this election. The staggering population growth of minority groups in America is expected to outnumber White Americans in 5 to 10 years. So get used to change! And as an Arab-American, I am offended by ignorant comments people continue to make about my race. I am not a terrorist and neither is my family! I mean, I'm considering a career in politics someday, but the notions people hold today about Arabs makes me uncomfortable & uncertain about my chances to serve this great nation. I wonder what people really think when I tell them I'm Middle Eastern and a Christian. Do they think I'm really lying? I hope not.
Anyways, I still love this country. I love that we can say what we want, but fear for my life as a result of this radical form of racism formed by my own people. At the same time, I'm enjoying the privileges & opportunities this country has given me, and I would do anything to give back to it. I'm getting a great education and am allowed to become whatever I want. In essence, I am a product of this country. America is my engine. However, in this time, my wish is that people begin to understand what it means to be a Christian, under the principle, "With your example, show them you are Christian." And throughout this election, people have been criticizing & questioning Presidential candidates on their religious belief, when in fact they're just as guilty (even more to a certain extent). The hypocrisy is ridiculous! Religion should function independently from politics. Jesus didn't come to us as a King: He came to save souls; not social government. A theocracy is a failed form of government, and unfortunately a few countries still implement it, namely Iran. A specific example is the Inquisition, which took place in Spain many centuries ago, where your head would be chopped if you didn't convert to Catholicism. Then, last decade the Great Pope John Paul II apologized on behalf of the Catholic Church. Let's not make the same mistake encountered in history. You can't force religion on people. Your vote should not be limited to a candidate's race, religious affiliation (unless they enforce them in policies), or superficial information. Instead, focus on those that can serve this country someone with stable temperament & judgment, against unjust war, an advocate of the Constitution, plan for boosting economy & inward job creation. I encourage everyone to think for themselves & of others, and to look past all barriers that divide us. If you say you're Christian, act like one. Racism is also a sin.
Now for those who say abortion is the only issue you're looking at. Please don't be fooled or naive! President Bush has been in office for 8 years, and hasn't done much to protect the unborn. Why? It's not Bush; he’s just one person. There’s 3 branches of government, where checks and balances is strictly followed & enforced. So, Roe v Wade would be an extremely difficult thing to overturn. And you know what? I believe abortion should be an option someone can pursue, although government-assisted abortion should be opposed by our leaders at all costs. I would not agree to pay the government taxes for a nasty cause, and be part of this crime against humanity. However, we cannot cage people. Everyone was born with freewill. If you don't remember, the Bible references (in the chapter of Genesis) that Adam & Eve disobeyed God by eating from the forbidden tree. What was the consequence? Pain & labor. God's punishment is far greater than our own government. If punishment doesn’t strike you on Earth, it will catch up to you on Judgment day. That's the beauty of freewill.
But get this, especially my fellow Catholics, under Barack Obama's healthcare plan, the rate of abortions will tremendously decrease. How? Well, the #1 concern for every parent is the health of their child. So, with health care being a necessity of life, there would be no need for abortion, because our government would be willing to help out (even with financial aid packages for unwilling single mothers or couples). That's where I differ from the average Catholic's view of what a "pro-life" candidate is. Don't say it, show me how it can be done! Anyways, Obama is many steps ahead of John McCain, who offers a sneaky health care plan. Your mom & dad would hate him if they found out what trick he's trying to pull on hardworking Americans. My other question to John McCain is...after you implement this "freemarket healthcare plan", and issue a ban on abortion, what is your plan to help the unwilling mothers & couples caught up in an unplanned pregnancy??? Is it more scams & old failed policies? Personally, he's using this point to advance his political agenda, and manipulate especially Catholic & ethics reform voters. I really want him to answer these question, because I think Obama is offering a great solution that still gives people choice & doesn't taint a human being's freewill. That’s remarkable change. Vote Obama & Biden 08!! Don’t vote for yourself; vote for your fellow countrymen!
Peace all & Highest Regards
Simon Werth
PS: By the way, please let me know what you think. Leave educated comments, criticism, arguments, supports, etc. Thanks! I was going to write more about what I see in this election, but I’ve chosen to keep my message short because this it would be an overwhelmingly long & complicated blog, which would detract from the main message.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081011/ap_on_el_pr/mccain_angry_crowds
My fellow Americans,
The notions you may have held in the past must be renewed & counteracted to secure America's place in the present and future. Americans cannot stick to their old & stubborn ways by using stereotypes to emphasize a choice in this election. The staggering population growth of minority groups in America is expected to outnumber White Americans in 5 to 10 years. So get used to change! And as an Arab-American, I am offended by ignorant comments people continue to make about my race. I am not a terrorist and neither is my family! I mean, I'm considering a career in politics someday, but the notions people hold today about Arabs makes me uncomfortable & uncertain about my chances to serve this great nation. I wonder what people really think when I tell them I'm Middle Eastern and a Christian. Do they think I'm really lying? I hope not.
Anyways, I still love this country. I love that we can say what we want, but fear for my life as a result of this radical form of racism formed by my own people. At the same time, I'm enjoying the privileges & opportunities this country has given me, and I would do anything to give back to it. I'm getting a great education and am allowed to become whatever I want. In essence, I am a product of this country. America is my engine. However, in this time, my wish is that people begin to understand what it means to be a Christian, under the principle, "With your example, show them you are Christian." And throughout this election, people have been criticizing & questioning Presidential candidates on their religious belief, when in fact they're just as guilty (even more to a certain extent). The hypocrisy is ridiculous! Religion should function independently from politics. Jesus didn't come to us as a King: He came to save souls; not social government. A theocracy is a failed form of government, and unfortunately a few countries still implement it, namely Iran. A specific example is the Inquisition, which took place in Spain many centuries ago, where your head would be chopped if you didn't convert to Catholicism. Then, last decade the Great Pope John Paul II apologized on behalf of the Catholic Church. Let's not make the same mistake encountered in history. You can't force religion on people. Your vote should not be limited to a candidate's race, religious affiliation (unless they enforce them in policies), or superficial information. Instead, focus on those that can serve this country someone with stable temperament & judgment, against unjust war, an advocate of the Constitution, plan for boosting economy & inward job creation. I encourage everyone to think for themselves & of others, and to look past all barriers that divide us. If you say you're Christian, act like one. Racism is also a sin.
Now for those who say abortion is the only issue you're looking at. Please don't be fooled or naive! President Bush has been in office for 8 years, and hasn't done much to protect the unborn. Why? It's not Bush; he’s just one person. There’s 3 branches of government, where checks and balances is strictly followed & enforced. So, Roe v Wade would be an extremely difficult thing to overturn. And you know what? I believe abortion should be an option someone can pursue, although government-assisted abortion should be opposed by our leaders at all costs. I would not agree to pay the government taxes for a nasty cause, and be part of this crime against humanity. However, we cannot cage people. Everyone was born with freewill. If you don't remember, the Bible references (in the chapter of Genesis) that Adam & Eve disobeyed God by eating from the forbidden tree. What was the consequence? Pain & labor. God's punishment is far greater than our own government. If punishment doesn’t strike you on Earth, it will catch up to you on Judgment day. That's the beauty of freewill.
But get this, especially my fellow Catholics, under Barack Obama's healthcare plan, the rate of abortions will tremendously decrease. How? Well, the #1 concern for every parent is the health of their child. So, with health care being a necessity of life, there would be no need for abortion, because our government would be willing to help out (even with financial aid packages for unwilling single mothers or couples). That's where I differ from the average Catholic's view of what a "pro-life" candidate is. Don't say it, show me how it can be done! Anyways, Obama is many steps ahead of John McCain, who offers a sneaky health care plan. Your mom & dad would hate him if they found out what trick he's trying to pull on hardworking Americans. My other question to John McCain is...after you implement this "freemarket healthcare plan", and issue a ban on abortion, what is your plan to help the unwilling mothers & couples caught up in an unplanned pregnancy??? Is it more scams & old failed policies? Personally, he's using this point to advance his political agenda, and manipulate especially Catholic & ethics reform voters. I really want him to answer these question, because I think Obama is offering a great solution that still gives people choice & doesn't taint a human being's freewill. That’s remarkable change. Vote Obama & Biden 08!! Don’t vote for yourself; vote for your fellow countrymen!
Peace all & Highest Regards
Simon Werth
PS: By the way, please let me know what you think. Leave educated comments, criticism, arguments, supports, etc. Thanks! I was going to write more about what I see in this election, but I’ve chosen to keep my message short because this it would be an overwhelmingly long & complicated blog, which would detract from the main message.
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Ouija Board & It's Connection to Evil
I get online today and discover a post in one of the forums I regularly visit to find a documentary on someone using an Ouija Board & becoming a Satanist. This guy had a terrible childhood, his father was an alcoholic & negligent of his parental duties, which left his son in need of love as a sense of belonging to someone for his own security. So, the guy in the documentary searches for love in the wrong places, namely the Ouija Board. He was fascinated & interested in the spirits the Ouija Board brought to his home by getting out of bed to search for them. One day, he was summoned by a demonic force, convincing him of conversion to Satanism. For four years, he performed satanic rituals, but during that time he felt guilty for his belief in them due to the little love and compassion left in his heart. Anyways, because of the little love and compassion in his heart, the demonic forces tried to kill him by making him commit suicide. However, in the darkness, he heard a voice calling for him to leave. He went to a lady at a local Church & she prayed over him and denounced the demons in the name of Jesus. Immediately, the man was healed & the devils left. He lived a normal life thereafter.
See the video here:
Online Videos by Veoh.com
Anyhow, this video definitely made my day. It made me realize that we can't take God for granted and should always recognize that what we have is good and we don't need anything more unless it's under God's will. You can't be misunderstanding about love. You only need God's love to keep living on Earth. And some day, when that day comes, you will be able to get closer to that love depending on how much you loved God here on Earth.
Simon Werth
See the video here:
Online Videos by Veoh.com
Anyhow, this video definitely made my day. It made me realize that we can't take God for granted and should always recognize that what we have is good and we don't need anything more unless it's under God's will. You can't be misunderstanding about love. You only need God's love to keep living on Earth. And some day, when that day comes, you will be able to get closer to that love depending on how much you loved God here on Earth.
Simon Werth
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Granite City
For anyone who lives in the Midwest, Granite City may be a popular restaurant in your area. Yesterday I had the privilege of eating at Granite City to celebrate the birthdays of two of my family members. Upon our arrival into the restaurant, we were greeted by the host and led to an open table able to seat six people. It was a quiet & comforting setting in a blinded room with dim recessed lighting, next to a transparent kitchen with many chefs & waiters/waitresses busily working to meet the demands of customers.
Upward & onward, away from the fluff above, my order was a Grilled London Broil with Bourbon Sauce. Goodness! It's by far the best thing I've ordered & ate during the short time I've lived in my area. It was a dish served with 12 oz of charbroiled of round steak (I requested well done) with a knife slipped underneath, which I primarily conclude is for etiquette. Anyways, the steak was dressed/marinated with bourbon sauce & caramelized onions with sides of crispy onion strings & mashed garlic red potatoes (you have an option for waffle fries). I couldn't the finish plate, which is a good thing, considering you spend ~$18 to satisfy your hunger. So, it may be something you order once in a while, or in a blue moon because of its price and heaviness in your stomach. But seriously, if you live around one or know of one by travel, stop by and treat yourself with a hearty meal. You won't be disappointed. What I tasted is only what I know & will remain somewhat of a secret until you try it!
I hope this blog makes you jealous or motivated to go order something at Granite City, although I know it was only 1 item that I ordered & need to make more visits before I confirm my judgment, which may or may not be enough to humble this message!?
Peace everyone. Until Next time!
Simon Werth
Friday, September 12, 2008
Brief Biography & Purpose of Blog
Simon Werth
College Junior
Majors Pursuing: Science, Medicine, Law
Purpose of Blog: To educate readers or share my opinions on anything and everything--whether mainstream or local--which include music, politics, medicine, school, food, poetry, personal reflections, rants, etc.
Further Information about Blog: I caution readers to not take my blog on a literal level rather have an open mind in the things I will be discussing on here. So, expect bias to come from this blog, although I don't tolerate controversial, slanderous, or derogatory language of any nature - in myself and of others. And if there's any information you take offense to, please let me know. Ignorance isn't something to be proud of!
Furthermore, I grant permission to those who want to use my blog in their websites or writing project. And if you need additional information for references used, leave your e-mail and I will get back to you. Anyways, I hope you enjoy the topics I will be tackling and expect your participation & comments to keep my blog busy. I certainly advocate and encourage a friendly & civilized debate or discussion. So, let's have some fun in here with the motto in mind "each one teach one".
Simon Werth
College Junior
Majors Pursuing: Science, Medicine, Law
Purpose of Blog: To educate readers or share my opinions on anything and everything--whether mainstream or local--which include music, politics, medicine, school, food, poetry, personal reflections, rants, etc.
Further Information about Blog: I caution readers to not take my blog on a literal level rather have an open mind in the things I will be discussing on here. So, expect bias to come from this blog, although I don't tolerate controversial, slanderous, or derogatory language of any nature - in myself and of others. And if there's any information you take offense to, please let me know. Ignorance isn't something to be proud of!
Furthermore, I grant permission to those who want to use my blog in their websites or writing project. And if you need additional information for references used, leave your e-mail and I will get back to you. Anyways, I hope you enjoy the topics I will be tackling and expect your participation & comments to keep my blog busy. I certainly advocate and encourage a friendly & civilized debate or discussion. So, let's have some fun in here with the motto in mind "each one teach one".
Simon Werth
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)